Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 22;17(7):936–943. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0679-9

Table 3.

Secondary outcomes, influence of manipulation, clinical prediction rule and interaction on pain and disability

Pain P value Disability (RMDQ) P value
1 week
 SMT 0.013 (−0.826 to 0.852) 0.976 −1.753 (−3.853 to 0.348) 0.102
 Rule status −0.693 (−1.462 to 0.076) 0.077 −1.802 (−3.749 to 0.144) 0.069
 SMT × rule status 0.308 (−0.781 to 1.396) 0.578 1.763 (−0.970 to 4.496) 0.205
2 weeks
 SMT −0.455 (−1.330 to 0.420) 0.306 −2.669 (−4.782 to −0.556) 0.014
 Rule status −0.995 (−1.796 to −0.193) 0.015 −2.139 (−4.101 to −0.178) 0.033
 SMT × rule status 0.114 (−1.021 to 1.248) 0.843 2.378 (−0.381 to 5.136) 0.091
4 weeks
 SMT −0.113 (−0.823 to 0.597) 0.754 −1.501 (−3.307 to 0.306) 0.103
 Rule status −0.540 (−1.191 to 0.110) 0.103 −1.625 (−3.301 to 0.052) 0.057
 SMT × rule status −0.215 (−1.135 to 0.705) 0.645 1.081 (−1.268 to 3.431) 0.366
12 weeks
 SMT −0.208 (−0.969 to 0.554) 0.592 −1.751 (−3.622 to 0.120) 0.066
 Rule status −0.367 (−1.066 to 0.333) 0.303 −2.164 (−3.901 to −0.428) 0.015
 SMT × rule status 0.051 (−0.934 to 1.036) 0.919 2.314 (−0.120 to 4.747) 0.062

Results of linear regression models for pain and disability. For both pain and disability, negative values represent improved outcomes. Results regarding the ability of the prediction rule to identify patients who respond most to SMT are presented in the line SMT × rule status

RMDQ Roland Morris disability questionnaire, SMT spinal manipulative therapy