Table 7. The distribution of promoter usage in the different SC types and the negative controls (NCs); the upper right section of the table shows the CpG-rich APs and the lower left section the CpG-poor APs.

***************	ASC (20.43±6.28)	ESC (15.63±5.16)	PASC (9.63±6.51)	QASC (26.79±3.85)	NC (18.12±2.81)	***************
ASC (4.73±1.02)	***************	0.1989	0.07734	0.08772	0.3703	ASC (20.43±6.28)
ESC (2.27±0.96)	0.005404	***************	0.2630	0.02206	0.4211	ESC (15.63±5.16)
pASC (0.73±0.74)	0.0007444	0.06135	***************	0.02536	0.1438	pASC (9.63±6.51)
qASC (8.87±2.04)	0.06095	0.01845	0.01236	***************	0.03970	qASC (26.79±3.85)
NC (6.19±2.32)	0.1607	0.003795	0.0005364	0.1361	***************	NC (18.12±2.81)
***************	ASC (4.73±1.02)	ESC (2.27±0.96)	pASC (0.73±0.74)	qASC (8.87±2.04)	NC (6.19±2.32)	***************

P-values calculated using the Welch two sample t-tests. The promoters are characterized using the Baek et al (2007) scheme. The notes for Table 5 provide further explanations.