Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 18;74(12):3672–3681. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02624-07

TABLE 6.

Multidrug resistance phenotypes of commensal E. coli isolates sampled across human vocation and swine production groupsa

Multidrug resistance response No. of multidrug-resistant E. coli isolate (% of total) samples byb:
Human vocation group
Swine production group
Non-swine workers/ nonconsumers (n = 528) Swine workers (n = 1,131) Non-swine workers (n = 1,675) Influent (mixed isolates) (n = 252) Slaughter holding pigs (n = 307) Breeding boars (n = 195) Quarantined boars (n = 331) Breeding/gestation females (n = 131) Farrowing sows and piglets (n = 755) Grower and finisher pigs (n = 1,576) Nursery piglets (n = 368)
0 309 (58.52) 747 (66.05) 1,100 (65.67) 158 (62.70) 24 (33.33) 15 (7.69) 4 (1.21) 20 (15.27) 110 (14.57) 233 (14.78) 18 (4.89)
1 99 (18.75) 203 (17.95) 295 (17.61) 47 (18.65) 29 (40.28) 85 (43.59) 67 (20.24) 69 (52.67) 283 (37.48) 780 (49.49) 120 (32.61)
2 32 (6.06) 67 (5.92) 82 (4.90) 21 (8.33) 10 (13.89) 46 (23.59) 73 (22.05) 24 (18.32) 127 (16.82) 284 (18.02) 55 (14.95)
3 45 (8.52) 52 (4.60) 74 (4.42) 10 (3.97) 4 (5.56) 34 (17.44) 70 (21.15) 11 (8.40) 141 (18.68) 165 (10.47) 68 (18.48)
4 18 (3.41) 23 (2.03) 67 (4.00) 8 (3.17) 3 (4.17) 10 (5.13) 75 (22.66) 7 (5.34) 60 (7.95) 74 (4.70) 53 (14.40)
5 12.00 (2.27) 18 (1.59) 28 (1.67) 5 (1.98) 1 (1.39) 5 (2.56) 30 (9.06) 0 (0.00) 13 (1.72) 27 (1.71) 18 (4.89)
6+c 13 (2.46) 21 (1.86) 29 (1.73) 3 (1.19) 1 (1.39) 0 (0.00) 12 (3.63) 0 (0.00) 21 (2.78) 13 (0.82) 36 (9.78)
a

Multidrug resistance phenotypes of commensal E. coli isolates (n = 7,477 overall sample isolates) from human and swine fecal isolates (human and swine cohorts). Frequencies and percentages of multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates are presented and contrasted with those of human vocation cohorts and swine production cohorts. Isolates are compared across all unit locations and seasons.

b

Multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates from human samples differed significantly (χ2 = 69.9, P < 0.001) among human vocation cohorts across all levels of multidrug resistance, using m-by-n likelihood-ratio chi-square test. Likewise, the multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates from swine samples differed significantly (χ2 = 495.2, P < 0.001) among swine production groups across all levels of multidrug resistance. Both P values are not adjusted for the dependence of responses within unit locations.

c

Multidrug resistance to greater than six antimicrobial agents (6+) was collapsed into a single upper category.