TABLE 3.
Collection (total no. of strains) | No. of strains (%) in AFLP cluster:
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IVa | IVb | |
Dutch carriage strains (829)a | 367 (44) | 216 (26)b | 176 (21)c | 46 (6) | 24 (3) |
Indonesia (81) | 44 (54) | 1 (1)b | 27 (33)c | 4 (5) | 5 (6) |
Semarang (33) | 20 (61) | 1 (3) | 11 (33) | 1 (3) | 0 |
Surabaya (48) | 24 (50) | 0 | 16 (33) | 3 (6) | 5 (10) |
Admission (19) | 7 (37) | 1 (5) | 8 (42) | 1 (5) | 2 (11) |
Discharge (25) | 17 (68) | 0 | 5 (20) | 2 (8) | 1 (4) |
Primary health center (18) | 10 (56) | 0 | 7 (39) | 1 (6) | 0 |
Relatives (19) | 10 (53) | 0 | 7 (37) | 0 | 2 (11) |
PVL positive (12) | 7 (58) | 1 (8) | 1 (8) | 0 | 3 (25)d |
PVL negative (69) | 37 (54) | 0 | 26 (38) | 4 (6) | 2 (3) |
PFGE cluster A (32) | 2 (6) | 1 (3) | 23 (72)e | 2 (6) | 4 (13) |
PFGE cluster B (47) | 40 (85)f | 0 | 4 (9) | 2 (4) | 1 (2) |
PFGE cluster C (2) | 2 (100) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
From reference 20.
Underrepresentation of Indonesian strains in cluster II compared with the representation of Dutch strains in this cluster (P < 0.001).
Overrepresentation of Indonesian strains in cluster III compared with the representation of Dutch strains in this cluster (P = 0.018).
Cluster IVb was significantly enriched with PVL in comparison with the other AFLP clusters (P = 0.022).
Proportionately more PFGE cluster A strains compared with the other PFGE cluster strains (P < 0.001).
Proportionately more PFGE cluster B strains compared with the other PFGE cluster strains (P < 0.001).