Skip to main content
. 2008 May 16;190(14):5087–5094. doi: 10.1128/JB.01976-07

TABLE 1.

Summary of selection rates for different competitionsa

Competition Strain characteristic(s) S (102) SE df t P
GA vs GC Endpoints 9.13 0.32 61 28.93 2.5E-37
GA vs GE Endpoints 4.99 0.11 137 46.30 1.5E-85
GD vs GA Endpoints 2.63 0.11 136 23.48 1.1E-49
GD vs GC Endpoints 8.24 0.23 106 35.11 3.4E-60
GD vs GE Endpoints 7.13 0.28 115 25.54 3.3E-49
GE vs GC Endpoints 0.73 0.04 59 19.22 4.4E-27
kA vs kD glpK 0.74 0.10 80 7.82 1.8E-11
kA vs kE glpK 4.47 0.38 13 11.73 2.7E-08
kC vs kA glpK 0.49 0.06 43 7.62 1.7E-09
kC vs kD glpK 4.58 0.64 17 7.18 1.6E-06
kC vs kE glpK 4.83 0.63 29 7.70 1.7E-08
kD vs kE glpK 0.66 0.04 45 14.94 4.6E-19
rkA vs rkE glpK+rpoB/C 9.39 0.27 122 34.83 3.1E-65
rkD vs rkA glpK+rpoB/C 2.07 0.05 99 37.89 9.9E-61
rkD vs rkE glpK+rpoB/C 10.41 0.33 112 31.66 1.1E-57
dE vs wt murE/dapF 0.22 0.09 14 2.58 2.2E-02
GD vs rkD murE/dapF 4.98 0.21 31 23.33 3.2E-21
GE vs rkE murE/dapF 2.60 0.06 31 41.59 9.2E-29
mD vs wt murE/dapF −0.06 0.05 29 −1.21 2.4E-01
rA vs rE rpoB/C 4.56 0.18 63 25.84 3.1E-35
rD vs rA rpoB/C 1.37 0.04 56 34.25 3.0E-39
rD vs rE rpoB/C 5.14 0.29 57 17.89 4.7E-25
a

S, selection rate; SE, standard error (95% confidence interval); df, degrees of freedom for the mixed-effect model fit; t, Student test t value; P, Student t test P value (null hypothesis S = 0).