Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002738

Table 1. Summary of the predictions of each hypothesis and overview of the methods used to test them (*Diversification any time subsequent to the formation of the Amazon river (5–12 mya) would be consistent with the riverine barrier hypothesis, therefore only diversification prior to 12 mya would falsify this prediction; we chose not to use this as a test of the riverine barrier hypothesis because it is nearly impossible to reject for these species, which originated no more than 14 mya [81].).

Predictions Pleistocene refugia Marine incursion Riverine barrier Methods used
Reciprocal monophyly of populations: in different refugia in Eastern base of Andes, Brazilian Shield, and/or Guiana Shield on opposite banks of Amazon River Parametric bootstrap, Bayesian hypothesis tests
Basal populations are located: in refugia in Eastern base of Andes, Brazilian Shield, and/or Guiana Shield N/A ML and Bayesian gene tree reconstruction
Derived populations are located: outside refugia in Amazonian lowlands N/A ML and Bayesian gene tree reconstruction
Barrier to gene flow: areas between refugia Amazonian lowlands Amazon River AMOVA, Mantel tests
Population history includes: bottlenecks and expansion bottlenecks and expansion N/A Mismatch distributions, Tajima's D
Population structure formed: during Pleistocene (10 kya–1.8 mya) during Miocene (10–15 mya) N/A* IM