Skip to main content
. 2008 May 12;154(5):1001–1008. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.177

Table 1.

Croton oil (CO)-treated mice: effect of i.p.-injected cannabidiol (CBD, 5 mg kg−1) alone or in the presence of the CB2 antagonist SR144528 (1 mg kg−1), the opioid antagonist naloxone (2 mg kg−1) or the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (1 mg kg−1) on intestinal transit in vivo

Treatment Motility (geometric centre)
Control (no croton oil) 4.91±0.43
Croton oil (CO) 6.65±0.41#
CO+CBD 5.01±0.36*
CO+CBD+SR144528 4.99±0.38*
CO+CBD+naloxone 4.98±0.44*
CO+CBD+yohimbine 4.97±0.43*

#P<0.05 vs control.

*P<0.05 vs croton oil.

N=8–10 animals for each experimental group. Transit was expressed as the geometric centre (GC) of the distribution of a fluorescent marker along the small intestine. GC ranged from 1 (minimal motility) to 10 (maximal motility) (see Methods section).