Table 3.

Adjusted estimates of neighborhood-level Poisson regression model analyses: associations between built-environment factors, overweight/obese, and various forms of physical activity^a

Model variables	Coefficient	SE	p-value	Estimated prevalenceb	95% CI
Overweight/obese
Land-use mix	−0.289	0.092	0.003	0.749	0.624, 0.899
Fast food outlets	0.067	0.018	0.001	1.069	1.031, 1.108
Neighborhood walking
Land-use mix	1.403	0.291	<0.000	4.066	2.285, 7.234
Street connectivity	0.148	0.068	0.034	1.159	1.012, 1.328
Public transit stations	0.061	0.057	0.291	1.062	0.949, 1.191
Green and open spaces	0.111	0.051	0.032	1.119	1.010, 1.238
Percentage African-American	−0.047	0.013	0.001	0.954	0.930, 0.979
Walking for transportation
Land-use mix	1.752	0.384	<0.001	5.764	2.698, 12.314
Street connectivity	0.180	0.061	0.004	1.198	1.062, 1.351
Public transit stations	0.137	0.053	0.011	1.147	1.033, 1.272
Green and open spaces	0.079	0.061	0.192	1.083	0.960, 1.221
Walking for errands
Land-use mix	0.402	0.201	0.047	1.495	1.005, 2.223
Street connectivity	0.104	0.046	0.025	1.109	1.014, 1.214
Public transit stations	0.037	0.034	0.274	1.038	0.970, 1.111
Green and open spaces	0.037	0.023	0.116	1.038	0.991, 1.089
Meeting physical activity recommendations
Land-use mix	0.380	0.167	0.025	1.463	1.050, 2.039
Street connectivity	0.162	0.035	<0.001	1.176	1.096, 1.262
Public transit stations	0.068	0.031	0.03	1.069	1.007, 1.137
Green and open spaces	0.062	0.015	<0.001	1.065	1.031, 1.098
Percentage Hispanic	0.007	0.003	0.032	1.007	1.001, 1.014

^aAdjusting for neighborhood-level covariates of residential density, median household income, percentage of African-American and Hispanic residents, and resident-level covariates of age, gender, race/ethnicity, employment status, home ownership, household income, health status, fruit and vegetable intake, fried-food consumption, and BMI.

^bPrevalence=exp (coefficient).