Table 1.

Results of college alcohol feedback interventions

Study	N	Feedback format	Drinking at follow-up
Agostinelli et al. (1995)	26	mailed feedback	▼ 6 weeks
Baer et al. (1992)	132	1 h individual+feedback	▼ 24 months
Borsari and Carey (2000)	60	1 h individual+feedback	▼ 6 weeks
Collins et al. (2002)	100	mailed feedback	▼ 6 weeks, n/s 6 months
Dimeff and McNeely (2000)	41	brief interaction+feedback	▼ 6 weeks
Larimer et al. (2001)	120	1 h individual+1 h group+feedback	▼ 12 months (males)
Marlatt et al. (1998)	456	1 h individual+mailed	▼ 6 months, ▼ 24 months
Murphy et al. (2004)	54	1 h individual+feedback	▼ 6 months
Murphy et al. (2001)	99	1 h individual+feedback	▼ 3 months (heavier drinkers), n/s 9 months
Neighbors et al. (2004)	252	computer feedback	▼ 3 months, ▼ 6 months
Neal and Carey (2004)	92	30 min individual+feedback	n/s 1 week
Walters (2000)	46	2 h group+mailed feedback, or mailed feedback only	n/s 6 weeks
Walters et al. (2000)	37	2 h group+feedback, or mailed feedback only	▼ 6 weeks