Table 1.
Study | N | Feedback format | Drinking at follow-up |
---|---|---|---|
Agostinelli et al. (1995) | 26 | mailed feedback | ▼ 6 weeks |
Baer et al. (1992) | 132 | 1 h individual+feedback | ▼ 24 months |
Borsari and Carey (2000) | 60 | 1 h individual+feedback | ▼ 6 weeks |
Collins et al. (2002) | 100 | mailed feedback | ▼ 6 weeks, n/s 6 months |
Dimeff and McNeely (2000) | 41 | brief interaction+feedback | ▼ 6 weeks |
Larimer et al. (2001) | 120 | 1 h individual+1 h group+feedback | ▼ 12 months (males) |
Marlatt et al. (1998) | 456 | 1 h individual+mailed | ▼ 6 months, ▼ 24 months |
Murphy et al. (2004) | 54 | 1 h individual+feedback | ▼ 6 months |
Murphy et al. (2001) | 99 | 1 h individual+feedback | ▼ 3 months (heavier drinkers), n/s 9 months |
Neighbors et al. (2004) | 252 | computer feedback | ▼ 3 months, ▼ 6 months |
Neal and Carey (2004) | 92 | 30 min individual+feedback | n/s 1 week |
Walters (2000) | 46 | 2 h group+mailed feedback, or mailed feedback only | n/s 6 weeks |
Walters et al. (2000) | 37 | 2 h group+feedback, or mailed feedback only | ▼ 6 weeks |