Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 24;51(25):2414–2421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.018

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards analysis for the time to occurrence of an index composite cardiac event.

Variable UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS MODEL 1* MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS MODEL 2
UNADJUSTED HR VALUE (95% CI) P- ADJUSTED HR VALUE (95% CI) P- ADJUSTED HR VALUE (95%CI) P-
Age (5 year increments) 1.1 (0.9–1.5) 0.28 --- --- --- ---
Gender 1.8 (0.5–6.2) 0.39 --- --- --- ---
NYHA functional class 2.0 (0.8–4.5) 0.12 2.7 (1.0–7.2) 0.04 2.6 (1.0–7.0) 0.05
CMR LVEDV index (ml/m2) (per 10 ml/m2 increments) 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.08 --- --- 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.70
Presence of CMR LGE (vs absence) 7.1 (2.0–25.4) 0.002 8.6 (2.4–31.6) 0.001 8.2 (2.2–30.9) 0.002
Excluding patients with CAD
Age (5 year increments) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.17 --- --- --- ---
Gender 1.9 (0.5–6.8) 0.33 --- --- --- ---
NYHA functional class 1.8 (0.8–4.4) 0.17 --- --- 2.1 (0.8–5.5) 0.15
CMR LVEDV index (ml/m2) (per 10 ml/m2 increments) 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.14 --- --- 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.9
Presence of CMR LGE (vs absence) 8.9 (2.4–32.2) 0.001 8.9 (2.4–32.2) 0.001 9.2 (2.4–35.1) 0.001
*

For Model 1 (parsimonious model), forward stepwise regression (p<0.10 for entry, p>0.05 for removal) was used to arrive at a parsimonious model.

For Model 2, NYHA functional class, CMR LVEDV index, and LGE fibrosis were all entered into the multivariate model.