Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):785–795. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060485

Table 2.

Summary of Measurement Parameters for Evaluated DQE Methods

Overall DQE Method IEC Apertures Beam Quality* MTF Device MTF Analysis Method NPS Analysis Method NPS Analysis Area ROI Size and Type NPS Band Size§ NPS Detrending
Dobbins et al None 70 kV 0.5 mm Cu Slit Dobbins et al Dobbins et al 640 × 640 Pixels (10) 128 Pixels, NOL ±4 Two-dimensional
(first order)
1024 × 1024 Pixels (1)
Samei and Flynn None 70 kV 19 mm Al Radiolucent edge Samei and Flynn Samei and Flynn
 Historical 640 × 640 Pixels (10) 128 Pixels, NOL ±7 With on-axis data Two-dimensional
(second order)
1280 × 1280 Pixels (1)
 Current 640 × 640 Pixels (3) 128 Pixels, OL
1280 × 1280 Pixels (1)
IEC|| External RQA5 Radiopaque edge IEC IEC 640 × 640 Pixels (3) 256 Pixels, OL ±7 Two-dimensional
(second order)
640 × 640 Pixels (10)

Note.—Parameters used in the Dobbins et al (8), Samei and Flynn (13), and IEC (4) methods are given.

*

Cu = copper, Al = aluminum.

The first set of parameters corresponds to the parameters employed for the evaluation of the NPS and combined NPS plus MTF dependence on the DQE estimate. Comparable statistical quality in the NPS estimates was achieved by varying the relative number of images analyzed with each method (5). The second set of parameters corresponds to results regarding the effect of the overall DQE method. The number of images analyzed was indicated by the specifications of each image, or in the case of the IEC method, by the requirement to use a total of at least 4 million independent image pixels in the NPS analysis. The number of images used is in parentheses.

NOL = nonoverlapping (one pass) ROIs, OL = overlapping (four passes) ROIs.

§

Number of rows of data averaged in two-dimensional NPS to produce a one-dimensional NPS curve.

||

The IEC method requires the use of 256 × 256-pixel ROIs for NPS analysis involving the use of an overlapping placement scheme achieved with four successive analysis passes with ROIs offset as follows: (x, y); x + 128, y; x, y + 128; and x + 128, y + 128. x And y are the reference coordinates for the top left-most corner of the analysis area.