Abstract
Assessment of the distal neurological status after injuries to the hand and fingers is one of the most frequent parts of standard trauma practice. Two‐point discrimination as clinical examination is often sufficient to identify such lesions, but difficulties occur in the comatose, young or otherwise uncooperative patient. This article describes a simple pain‐free alternative method of assessing digital nerve integrity by submerging the finger tip in water and observing if wrinkles develop on the skin.
A 28‐year‐old right‐handed mechanic accidentally fell through a glass door, sustaining a deep cut to the volar aspect of his wrist. Initial examination showed multiple flexor tendon injuries as well as abnormal two‐point discrimination in the radial three digits. Unfortunately, he absconded from hospital before undergoing surgery. A few months later he returned with a dense motor and sensory palsy of the median nerve. Interestingly, in addition to the disabling motor and sensory deficits, he had noticed a curious phenomenon that occurred when his hand was immersed in warm water—that is, the fingers “did not all go wrinkly”. Reproduction of the phenomenon in clinic (by immersing the hand in warm water for 5 min) showed that the area of the skin that did not wrinkle corresponded to the area of the sensory defect—that is, the territory of the median nerve (fig 1).
Figure 1 Absence of wrinkling in the denervated median nerve territory and inadvertent burns to the insensate radial two digits are also evident.
Discussion
Autonomic function is often the “Cinderella Modality” of a nerve's function. The more obvious motor and sensory deficits can dominate the picture of symptoms. Sympathetic unmyelinated fibres in a peripheral nerve are among the most resistant to mechanical trauma. As such, damage to these fibres suggests a more severe injury. Disturbance of sympathetic function is therefore an important early feature of nerve damage. Testing autonomic function can be difficult and several methods are in common use. Each method relies on either directly or indirectly testing for the presence of sweat.
The simplest method is to look for sweat droplets.1 Probably the most commonly used test is the ballpoint pen test. This relies on the loss of tactile adherence in an anhydrotic area when a ballpoint pen is lightly drawn across the skin.2 Lightly dusting the skin with grey quinizarin powder (starch and iodine) shows up the wet areas as deep purple. The print test, using triketohydrindene hydrate, works in a similar way.3 More quantifiable results can be obtained by testing skin resistance using an electronic ohmmeter (the Richter dermometer), with dry areas of skin having a higher resistance.
Moberg4,5 and others6,7,8 have suggested that the results of the two‐point discrimination test and the print test are the most closely correlated with eventual hand function. The print test is messy and inconvenient. It also relies on being able to keep the chemical reagents dry; in practice, this can be difficult.
The common clinical scenario of an injury in a young or inebriated patient can present a challenge when trying to ascertain the presence of a concomitant nerve lesion. Surgical exploration is often necessary to establish the diagnosis or a repeat clinical examination when the patient is more cooperative. The standard method of two‐point discrimination is not always feasible in a child and relies on a certain level of cooperation from the adult patient. The more objective sweat‐based tests are messy and technically difficult, and so are not often used.
By simply wrapping the traumatised digit in a wet swab on admission to the accident department, within a few minutes, any subsequent examination of the distribution of skin wrinkles by the casualty doctor will show whether any serious injury to the autonomic (and hence other) fibres has taken place. This will hopefully avoid unnecessary surgical exploration, or the even more serious sequelae of a missed nerve injury. AT has also worked in the developing countries, where this simple cheap test has proved extremely useful in the context of limited medical resources.
References
- 1.Kahn E A. Direct observation of sweating in peripheral nerve injuries. Surg Gynecol Obstet 19519222–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harrison S H. The tactile adherence test estimating loss of sensation after nerve injury. Hand 19746148–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aschan W, Moberg E. The ninhydrin finger printing test used to map out partial lesions to hand nerves. Acta Chir Scand 1962123365–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moberg E. Criticism and study of methods for examining sensibility in the hand. Neurology 1962128–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moberg E. Evaluation and management of nerve injuries in the hand. Surg Clin North Am 1964441019–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vasudevan T M, van Rij A M, Nukada H.et al Skin wrinkling for the assessment of sympathetic function in the limbs. Aust N Z J Surg 20007057–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Novak C B, Mackinnon S E, Kelly L. Correlation of two‐point discrimination and hand function following median nerve injury. Ann Plast Surg 199331495–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Phelps P E, Walker E. Comparison of the finger wrinkling test results to established sensory tests in peripheral nerve injury. Am J Occup Ther 197731565–572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

