Table 1.
AUC (percent) values for Datasets 1 and 2 for eight methods
| MAS | RMA | DFW | ||||
| Method | Dataset 1 | Dataset 2 | Dataset 1 | Dataset 2 | Dataset 1 | Dataset 2 |
| WAD | 96.772(1) | 97.684(1) | 99.980(1) | 98.240(4) | 100.00(1) | 99.953(1) |
| AD | 83.381(6) | 96.430(8) | 99.897(6) | 98.631(2) | 100.00(1) | 99.948(2) |
| FC | 83.092(7) | 96.445(7) | 99.655(8) | 98.617(3) | 100.00(1) | 99.948(2) |
| RP | 81.981(8) | 96.626(6) | 99.757(7) | 99.161(1) | 99.993(4) | 99.938(3) |
| modT | 93.257(4) | 97.561(4) | 99.928(5) | 98.109(7) | 99.983(7) | 98.459(6) |
| samT | 94.002(3) | 97.547(5) | 99.944(3) | 98.139(6) | 99.988(5) | 98.656(4) |
| shrinkT | 92.379(5) | 97.617(3) | 99.955(2) | 97.846(8) | 99.984(6) | 98.558(5) |
| ibmT | 94.693(2) | 97.618(2) | 99.941(4) | 98.183(5) | 99.983(7) | 98.455(7) |
Numbers in parentheses show the rankings. Signal intensities smaller than 1 in the MAS-preprocessed data were set to 1 so that the logarithm of the data could be taken.