Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb;4(1):223–234. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2008.04.01.223

Table 7.

Cost-consequence analysis of candesartan compared with placebo in the treatment of HF – clinical benefits and annual per patient saving/cost increase (95% CI)

Trial Clinical benefits vs placebo DRG costs Per-diem costs
CHARM-Alternative CV deaths (−15%) HF admission (−32%) Net increase (€22 ± 245/year) Savings (€291 ± 421/year)
CHARM-Added CV deaths (−16%) HF admission (−17%) Savings (€81 ± 214/year) Savings (€267 ± 328/year)
CHARM-Preserved CV deaths (−1%), ns HF admission (−15%) Net increase (€249 ± 128/year) Net increase (€249 ± 232/year)
CHARM-Overall CV deaths (−12%) HF admission (−21%) Net increase (€83 ± 111/year) Savings (€56 ± 179/year)

Abbreviations: CV, cardiovascular; DRG, diagnosis related group; HF, heart failure.