Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec;15(6):393–399. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017525

Table 3 Attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding the conduct and benefits of root cause analyses.

Questionnaire item Participants responding, n (%)
Strongly agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly disagree
Undertaking an RCA is a time‐consuming business. Is it good use of staff time and resources? (n = 252) 59 (23.4) 124 (49.2) 51 (20.2) 13 (5.2) 5 (2.0)
RCAs should be conducted by colleagues with a clinical background and not by outsiders (n = 250) 25 (10.0) 173 (29.2) 60 (24.0) 85 (34.0) 7 (2.8)
Consumers should be part of RCA teams (n = 248) 32 (12.9) 82 (33.1) 70 (28.2) 48 (19.4) 16 (6.5)
The achievements and benefits of conducting RCAs are that they:
Improve work processes (n = 252) 80 (31.7) 143 (56.7) 24 (9.5) 3 (1.2) 2 (0.8)
Improve patient safety (n = 251) 82 (32.5) 139 (55.4) 25 (10.0) 3 (1.2) 2 (0.8)
Help people work together in teams (n = 249) 60 (24.1) 140 (56.2) 40 (16.1) 9 (3.6) 0 (0)
Improve communication about patient care (n = 252) 70 (27.8) 131 (52.0) 42 (16.7) 8 (3.2) 1 (0.4)
Improve patient outcomes (n = 247) 57 (23.1) 134 (54.3) 49 (19.8) 5 (2.0) 2 (0.8)
Improve the standing of my profession (n = 252) 40 (15.9) 95 (37.7) 88 (34.9) 21 (8.3) 8 (3.2)

RCA, root cause analysis.