Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec;15(6):393–399. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017525

Table 4 Attitudes of healthcare professionals towards safety skills acquired from, and the value of, the Safety Improvement Program.

Questionnaire item Participants responding, n (%)
Strongly agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly disagree
Since undertaking the SIP do you think that you are better trained in methods of dealing with patient safety in healthcare? (n = 251) 69 (27.5) 162 (64.1) 12 (4.8) 8 (3.2) 1 (0.4)
Since undertaking the SIP do you think you can improve work processes for the provision of clinical care? (n = 251) 43 (17.1) 161 (64.1) 31 (12.4) 15 (6.0) 1 (0.4)
Over the long term, the SIP will build a leadership group for advancement of safety in healthcare (n = 251) 60 (23.9) 123 (49.0) 54 (21.5) 10 (4.0) 4 (1.6)
Considering the health system's investment in the SIP, are the benefits you see worth the investment? (n = 248) 79 (31.9) 106 (42.7) 47 (19.0) 12 (4.8) 4 (1.6)
Definitely Partly Unsure Slightly Not at all
Have you been able to apply the knowledge learnt from the SIP to your workplace? (n = 250) 168 (67.2) 74 (29.6) 4 (1.6) 2 (0.8) 2 (0.8)
Have your work practices regarding safety and reporting errors changed since you attended the SIP? (n = 250) 98 (39.2) 101 (40.4) 11 (4.4) 17 (6.8) 23 (9.2)
Did you have a sufficient understanding by the end of the SIP of what was required to conduct an RCA? (n = 250) 145 (58.0) 90 (36.0) 1 (0.4) 13 (5.2) 1 (0.4)
In general, did the SIP provide you the skills to be involved in or lead an RCA ?(n = 251) 123 (49.0) 110 (43.8) 4 (1.6) 12 (4.8) 2 (0.8)
 

RCA, root cause analysis; SIP, Safety Improvement Programme.