Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb;16(1):51–59. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019778

Table 2 Atrial fibrillation audit: incidence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation (January 2000 to December 2003) and guideline compliance.

Observed number (standardised rate per million per month) City I: AF training City II: TIA training (control) North: AF training South & West: TIA training (control) Pooled significance Combined odds ratio estimate (95% CI)
Diagnosis of AF
 Before intervention (27 months) 62 (56*) 50 (49*) 129 (113*) 192 (69*) 0.026†‡ 1.36*‡
 After intervention (21 months) 58 (64*) 43 (56*) 166 (186*) 166 (77*) (1.04 to 1.78)
Number (%) complying with best practice recommendations City I: AF training City II: TIA training (control) Standardised difference in % (AF trained – untrained) North: AF training South & West: TIA training (control) Standardised difference in % (AF trained – untrained) Pooled significance Combined odds ratio (95% CI)
Not complying at intervention 76 75 116 214
 Complying by end of study (n) 14 (18%) 13 (17%) +2.2%‡ 42 (36%) 55 (26%) +10.6%‡ 0.103†‡ 1.42‡ (0.93 to 2.17)
Diagnosed July 2000 to Mar 2002 (21 months) 42 44 107 145
 Complying before intervention (n) 22 (52%) 22 (50%) +4.7%‡ 60 (56%) 76 (52%) +3.4%‡ 0.543†‡ 1.14‡ (0.74 to 1.76)
Diagnosed April 2002 to Dec 2003 (21 months) 58 43 166 166
 Complying by end of study (n) 38 (66%) 22 (51%) +14.8%‡ 101 (61%) 93 (56%) +6.9%‡ 0.141†‡ 1.34‡ (0.91 to 1.96)

AF, atrial fibrillation; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

*Adjusted for sampling fraction in each practice.

Mantel–Haenzel test.

Standardised or adjusted for age and sex.

Together the combined odds ratios in the last subtable estimate the odds that training improves compliance at 1.18 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.45).