Skip to main content
. 2007 May 31;41(10):627–638. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.035691

Table 2 Study quality scores.

Study reference Allocation to intervention group Assigned intervention concealed before allocation Outcomes of participants who withdrew described + included in analysis Outcome assessors blinded Inclusion/exclusion criteria clearly defined? Groups comparable at entry Interventions clearly defined Definition outcome measures Surveillance period active and of clinically appropriate duration Total score Quality rating
Emery14 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 10 M
Grace13 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 8 P
Heidt15 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 2 2 11 M
Hewett19 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 2 8 P
Junge16 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 2 9 M
Mandelbaum20 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 2 9 M
McIntosh17 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 8 P
Olsen18 1 0 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 13 M
Webster12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 5 P
Wedderkopp21 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 2 10 M
Wedderkopp22 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 10 M
Yang11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 6 P

M, moderate; P, poor.