Table 2.
Weight (g) during pregnancy of F0 and F1 females at different stages of gestation (days)
| 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF0 (n = 17) | 714.3 (32.2) | 747.0 (33.3) | 782.6 (30.4) | 856.6 (31.4) | 940.9 (32.6) | 1054.9 (36.4) | 1136.9 (37.5) |
| ERF0 (n = 15) | 645.1 (44.0) | 678.5 (45.4) | 713.8 (46.1) | 804.9 (48.9) | 933.8 (53.9) | 1051.9 (58.7) | 1133.8 (60.3) |
| LRF0 (n = 14) | 703.1 (38.9) | 738.3 (40.2) | 789.3 (34.7) | 864.0 (34.4) | 964.5 (36.5) | 1058.2 (40.9) | 1140.2 (42.1) |
| CF1 (n = 7) | 750.8 (71.8) | 787.9 (63.9) | 834.0 (67.4) | 898.1 (49.5) | 1002.8 (45.2) | 1098.9 (57.8) | 1138.9 (53.7) |
| ERF1 (n = 7) | 634.6 (44.0) | 687.8 (38.1) | 728.7 (38.1) | 816.0 (32.5) | 927.7 (38.3) | 1023.2 (45.8) | 1068.6 (42.6) |
| LRF2 (n = 11) | 840.6 (27.2) | 864.6 (23.1) | 888.7 (23.3) | 955.1 (27.9) | 1054.8 (30.3) | 1134.0 (34.6) | 1171.5 (32.1) |
Comparison of weight gain of F0 and F1 females through pregnancy. F0 females were nutritionally restricted during early (ERF0) or late (LRF0) pregnancy or fed ad libitum (CF0). These F0 females were the mothers of the F1 females (F1 females were fed ad libitum throughout pregnancy). Group data (mean ±s.e.m.) were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post hoc comparison.