Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 2;41(8):510–514. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033571

Table 3 Comparison of foot examination postures for proximal and non‐proximal stress fracture of the second metatarsal.

No with proximal fracture (n = 13) No with non‐proximal fracture (n = 45) p Value
Pas planus 4 (30.8) 3 (6.7) 0.0619
Pes cavus 1 (7.7) 0 0.5046
Hallux rigidus 3 (22.1) 5 (11.1) 0.5186
Hallux valgus 2 (15.4) 4 (8.9) 0.8725
Achilles contracture 3 (22.1) 0 0.0093*
First ray hypermobility 2 (15.4) 2 (4.4) 0.4533
Leg length discrepancy 0 0
First/second metatarsal length 0.80 (0.2) 0.95 (0.25) 0.0341*

Values in parentheses are percentages.

*Significance at p<0.05.