Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2006 Jan 17;45(2):604–616. doi: 10.1021/bi0517178

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(A) Representative data for ITC of DNA duplexes. A 75 μM solution of D-I S2 was titrated into 1.4 mL of a 5 μM solution of D-I S1. Solutions were equilibrated at 45 °C. Both DNAs were in 10 mM NaHEPES, pH 7.5, and 1 M added NaCl. The upper panel shows the raw thermogram. The lower panel shows integrated injection data (solid squares) and a least-squares fit of the data to a one-site binding model (solid line), yielding the following parameters: ΔH = −84.4 kcal mol−1; ΔS = −128 cal mol−1 K−1; KA = 1.1 × 108 M−1; n = 0.95; c = 522. Values of KA and ΔS have relatively large errors due to the high c-value. Data collection parameters were designed to optimize the accuracy of ΔH and ΔCp to facilitate the comparisons relevant to this study. (B) Plot of ΔH values observed by ITC for formation of duplex D-I at 0.1 M added NaCl (solid circles), 0.4 M added NaCl (solid squares), and 1.0 M added NaCl (solid triangles). Dashed lines represent linear least-squares fits of each data series; the slope of each fit corresponds to a linear approximation of the observed ΔCp. (C) Plot of ΔH values observed by ITC for formation of duplex D-V. All conventions are the same as in (B).