Table 2 Associations of procedural and interactional justice with smoking status: adjusted ORs and their 95% CIs from logistic regression models with generalised estimating equations.
| Participants, n | ORs (95% CI), adjusted for: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (A) | A + education, SEP, marital status, job contract and NA (B) | B+job strain and ERI (C) | ||
| Women | 27 121 | |||
| Procedural justice | ||||
| High | 9888 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Intermediate | 8740 | 0.96 (0.89 to 1.04) | 0.95 (0.88 to 1.03) | 0.94 (0.87 to 1.02) |
| Low | 8493 | 1.05 (0.96 to 1.13) | 1.05 (0.96 to 1.13) | 1.02 (0.94 to 1.11) |
| Interactional justice | ||||
| High | 9642 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Intermediate | 9095 | 0.97 (0.90 to 1.05) | 0.96 (0.89 to 1.04) | 0.96 (0.88 to 1.03) |
| Low | 8384 | 1.09 (1.01 to 1.19) | 1.01 (0.93 to 1.10) | 0.99 (0.91 to 1.07) |
| Men | 6900 | |||
| Procedural justice | ||||
| High | 2581 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Intermediate | 2047 | 1.07 (0.93 to 1.24) | 0.96 (0.83 to 1.11) | 0.96 (0.83 to 1.10) |
| Low | 2272 | 1.11 (0.96 to 1.29) | 0.96 (0.83 to 1.11) | 0.94 (0.81 to 1.09) |
| Interactional justice | ||||
| High | 2227 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Intermediate | 2521 | 1.05 (0.91 to 1.22) | 1.00 (0.86 to 1.15) | 1.00 (0.86 to 1.15) |
| Low | 2152 | 1.11 (0.96 to 1.29) | 0.97 (0.83 to 1.13) | 0.95 (0.82 to 1.11) |
ERI, effort–reward imbalance; NA, negative affectivity; SEP, socioeconomic position.