Skip to main content
. 2007 May;61(5):427–433. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.061739

Table 3 Associations of procedural and interactional justice with heavy smoking (⩾20 cigarettes/day) among current smokers: adjusted ORs and their 95% CIs from logistic regression models with generalised estimating equations.

Participants, n ORs (95% CI), adjusted for:
Age (A) A+education, SEP, marital status, job contract and NA (B) B+job strain and ERI (C)
Women 4666
 Procedural justice
  High 1705 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Intermediate 1458 1.06 (0.81 to 1.38) 1.03 (0.79 to 1.35) 1.01 (0.77 to 1.33)
  Low 1503 1.44 (1.12 to 1.82) 1.34 (1.04 to 1.73) 1.32 (1.02 to 1.71)
 Interactional justice
  High 1617 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Intermediate 1505 1.24 (0.96 to 1.60) 1.20 (0.93 to 1.56) 1.19 (0.92 to 1.53)
  Low 1544 1.57 (1.22 to 2.02) 1.41 (1.09 to 1.83) 1.39 (1.06 to 1.81)
Men 1629
 Procedural justice
  High 571 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Intermediate 495 1.22 (0.93 to 1.59) 1.01 (0.76 to 1.33) 1.03 (0.77 to 1.36)
  Low 563 1.66 (1.23 to 2.17) 1.44 (1.09 to 1.90) 1.48 (1.10 to 2.00)
 Interactional justice
  High 502 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Intermediate 595 0.97 (0.74 to 1.28) 0.90 (0.68 to 1.20) 0.92 (0.69 to 1.23)
  Low 532 1.59 (1.22 to 2.07) 1.35 (1.03 to 1.77) 1.38 (1.03 to 1.83)

ERI, effort–reward imbalance; NA, negative affectivity; SEP, socioeconomic position.