Table 3.
Proportions (%) consenting to initial proposal | |||||
Baseline Risk | Level of effectiveness | ARR | RRR | NNT | POL |
Low | Small | 60 (48; 70) | 65 (53; 75) | 56 (43; 68) | 49 (37; 61) |
Large | 71 (59; 80) | 78 (65; 87) | 67 (54; 77) | 59 (47; 70) | |
High | Small | 72 (60; 81) | 77 (65; 85) | 70 (59; 80) | 53 (43, 64) |
Large | 67 (55; 77) | 73 (61; 82) | 73 (61; 83) | 64 (53; 74) | |
Total | 67 (61; 72) | 73 (67; 78) | 67 (61; 72) | 56 (51; 62) | |
Proportions (%) consenting to final proposal | |||||
Baseline Risk | Level of effectiveness | ARR | RRR | NNT | POL |
Low | Small | 59 (48; 70) | 57 (46; 68) | 52 (40; 64) | 60 (47; 71) |
Big | 71 (59; 80) | 71 (59; 81) | 64 (51; 74) | 66 (54; 76) | |
High | Small | 70 (58; 80) | 69 (57; 79) | 71 (60; 80) | 60 (49; 70) |
Big | 67 (55; 77) | 73 (61; 82) | 79 (68; 87) | 71 (60; 80) | |
Total | 67 (61; 72) | 67 (62; 73) | 67 (61; 72) | 64 (58; 69) | |
Concordance (%) between initial and final response | |||||
Baseline Risk | Level of effectiveness | ARR | RRR | NNT | POL |
Low | Small | 90 (81; 95) | 93 (83; 97) | 84 (72; 91) | 86 (76; 93) |
Big | 100 (94; 100) | 91 (80; 96) | 91 (81; 96) | 93 (83; 97) | |
High | Small | 92 (82; 97) | 88 (78; 94) | 91 (82; 96) | 90 (81; 95) |
Big | 97 (89; 99) | 94 (85; 98) | 90 (79; 95) | 93 (85; 97) | |
Total | 94 (91; 97) | 91 (87; 94) | 89 (84; 92) | 90 (86; 93) | |
Concordance (%) between initial and final response according to initial response | |||||
Initial consent? | ARR | RRR | NNT | POL | |
No | 92 (84; 96) | 94 (84; 98) | 83 (74; 90) | 80 (72; 86) | |
Yes | 95 (91; 98) | 90 (84; 94) | 92 (86; 95) | 98 (94; 100) |