Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):435–452. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d3d

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients, p-values, and slopes of linear regression analyses for the ECAP-PFM comparison; and speech perception scores for each subject.

Subject r-value p-value Linear regression slope CNC words (% Correct) CNC phonemes (% Correct) BKB-SIN (dB SNR)
R1 0.78 <0.01* 0.84 46 68 15.2
R2 0.13 0.70 0.06 83 93 4.2
R3 0.80 <0.01* 0.80 42 64 13.5
R4 0.42 0.18 0.48 68 86 4.8
R5 0.29 0.37 0.14 78 90 6.5
R6 0.85 <0.01* 0.54 17 42 13.8
R7 0.55 0.06 0.16 39 64 6.8
R9 0.82 0.01* 0.45 1 20 22.5
R10 0.75 <0.01* 0.78 35 58 12.7
C1 0.69 0.01* 0.46 21 43 19.2
C2 0.68 0.02* 0.68 39 62 14.8
C4 0.79 <0.01* 0.60 69 84 14.5
C5 0.38 0.23 0.20 37 64 17.2
C6 0.54 0.07 0.33 67 81 15.2
C7 0.73 <0.01* 0.49 8 25 21.8
C8 0.14 0.66 0.18 75 89 5.8
C9 0.45 0.14 0.22 37 63 3.5
C10 0.80 <0.01* 0.67 5 23 22.2

CNC = Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant, BKB-SIN = Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech in Noise, SNR = signal-to-noise ratio.

*

Statistically significant at alpha = 0.05.