Table 2.
Questions used to assess scientific quality of the study and the reader's ability to adequately understand the intervention
| Questions | Trials with Comparison Groups | Trials with evaluation before & after | Observational | 
| Is the strategy defined? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Is there a methods section? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Are the strategy and methods sections defined in a comprehensive way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Is the study question clearly defined? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Are outcomes/outputs clearly defined? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Can outcomes be attributed to interventions? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Is the explanation of the target population sufficient? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Is the target population studied appropriate? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Was the method used to obtain cases and controls explained? | Yes | No | No | 
| Was randomization used to select cases and controls? | Yes | No | No | 
| Was the method of selecting cases and controls appropriate? | Yes | No | No | 
| Was a method for checking immunization status described? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Was the method for determining sample size provided? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Have confounders been identified? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Were the confounders taken into consideration? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Was the time frame of the study defined? | Yes | Yes | No | 
| Is the time frame sufficient for the intervention to have an impact? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Did the authors make comments regarding limitations of the strategy? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Did the authors compare results with similar studies? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Was adequate data analysis conducted? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 
| Was the response rate adequate? | No | Yes | No |