Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 30;3(7):e2802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002802

Table 3. Number of species per genus resolved as monophyletic for each of five proposed multilocus barcoding combinations.

Citation for the proposed combination: Proposed barcoding combinations
rbcL+trnH-psbA matK+rpoC1+rpoB matK+rpoC1+trnH-psbA matK+atpF–atpH+trnH-psbA matK+atpF–atpH+psbK–psbI
Kress and Erickson [8] Chase et al. [9] Chase et al. [9] Lee et al. [20] Lee et al. [20]
Major clade Genus No. of species surveyed
Angiosperms Acer 5 3 3 3 3 3
Betula 2 0 0 0 M M
Cornus 4 4 2 4 4 4
Erigeron 2 0 0 0 0 0
Eupatorium 2 2 2 2 2 2
Lactuca 2 2 2 2 2 2
Plantago 3 2 3 3 3 3
Poa 2 2 2 2 2 2
Polygonum 4 4 3 4 4 3
Populus 4 3 1 2 2 3
Quercus 3 1 1 1 1 1
Rhamnus 3 3 3 3 3 3
Rubus 4 3 4 4 4 4
Salix 3 2 2 2 2 3
Silene 2 2 2 2 2 2
Solanum 2 2 2 2 2 2
Solidago 6 0 0 0 0 0
Sonchus 2 0 M M M M
Symphyotrichum 7 0 2 2 1 2
Trifolium 2 2 2 2 2 2
Typha 2 0 0 0 0 0
Viburnum 3 3 2 3 3 3
Gymnosperms Juniperus 2 2 2 2 2 2
Picea 2 0 0 0 2 2
Pinus 3 3 3 3 3 3
Monilophytes Dryopteris 3 1 1 1 1 1
Equisetum 2 2 M 0 0 M
Lycophytes Lycopodium 2 2 2 2 2 2
Bryophytes Brachythecium 3 3 3 3 3 3
Dicranum 2 2 2 2 2 2
Plagiomnium 2 2 2 2 2 2
Polytrichum 2 2 2 2 2 2
No. of species amplified for at least two populations 92 90 92 92 90
Percent species monophyletic (of those amplified and sequenced) 64 61 65 66 69
Percent species monophyletic (of those attempted) 64 60 65 66 67

Values indicate the number of species for each genus identified as monophyletic with at least 70% bootstrap support for each multi-locus combination; ‘M’ indicates that none of the species in that genus had more than one sample, or that only one species was amplified and sequenced.