TABLE 1.
Nominal diameter as stated by manufacturer (nm) | Measured mean diameter, DM (nm) | Gaussian mean diameter, D0 (nm) | Gaussian halfwidth, w (nm) | Mean diameter displacement, ΔD0 (nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
100 ± 6 | 123 | 113 ± 1 | 17 ± 0 | 0 |
210 ± 21 | 209 | 178 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 | 4 |
500 ± 20 | 515 | 521 ± 2 | 53 ± 3 | 37 |
1000 ± 32 | 977 | 1002 ± 6 | 99 ± 7 | 243 |
Comparison of labeled colloidal bead specifications with measured values. From the left, the first column displays the nominal bead diameter and intersample variations of the mean as stated by the manufacturer. Columns 2–5 show measured mean diameter, DM, Gaussian mean diameter, D0, Gaussian halfwidth of population, w, and mean diameter displacement, ΔD0. The quantities D0, w, and ΔD0 are quantities resulting from the Gaussian fit of the populations in Fig. 3 B, whereas DM is the mean value of all converted beads. The mean diameter displacement, ΔD0,, is calculated as the difference between homogeneous and confocal illumination graphs in Fig. 3 A.