Table 1.
Descriptive statistics for males and females in young and old cohort separately
| Young cohort | Old cohort | rFSIQ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | Males | Females | |||||||
| N (%) | FSIQ (SD) | N (%) | FSIQ (SD) | N (%) | FSIQ (SD) | N (%) | FSIQ (SD) | |||
| Moderators | ||||||||||
| Partner | Low | 15 (16%) | 101.69 (11.57) | 25 (19%) | 101.84 (7.74) | 55 (55%) | 102.14 (12.63) | 59 (37%) | 99.84 (12.11) | 0.19 |
| High | 79 (84%) | 103.75 (10.30) | 107 (81%) | 105.52 (11.80) | 45 (45%) | 111.09 (13.51) | 100 (63%) | 106.29 (10.07) | ||
| Parental | Low | 75 (42%) | 98.88 (10.93) | 82 (43%) | 102.03 (10.10) | 95 (74%) | 103.13 (11.81) | 158 (78%) | 101.32 (11.02) | 0.28 |
| High | 103 (58%) | 106.33 (9.91) | 109 (57%) | 107.51 (10.71) | 33 (26%) | 110.84 (16.39) | 45 (22%) | 109.80 (10.26) | ||
| Urbanization | Very low | 18 (10%) | 99.47 (12.80) | 23 (12%) | 103.26 (11.07) | 28 (20%) | 104.70 (12.68) | 43 (20%) | 103.45 (11.71) | −0.10 |
| Low | 29 (17%) | 100.17 (8.60) | 48 (24%) | 103.99 (11.18) | 40 (28%) | 104.36 (14.82) | 46 (21%) | 100.75 (11.92) | ||
| Moderate | 34 (19%) | 102.14 (12.20) | 34 (17%) | 103.05 (10.45) | 32 (22%) | 105.94 (13.25) | 55 (25%) | 104.01 (10.49) | ||
| High | 41 (23%) | 104.12 (10.34) | 37 (19%) | 105.88 (12.59) | 21 (15%) | 104.12 (14.67) | 58 (27%) | 101.72 (12.18) | ||
| Very high | 53 (30%) | 106.21 (10.24) | 58 (29%) | 106.33 (9.85) | 22 (15%) | 104.55 (10.23) | 17 (8%) | 104.46 (7.83) | ||
| Mean real estate price | 180.53 (56.78) | 188.50 (56.82) | 198.67 (49.67) | 189.83 (49.89) | 0.09 | |||||
| Total | N = 182 | 103.17 (10.91) | N = 203 | 104.70 (10.99) | N = 146 | 104.52 (13.20) | N = 224 | 102.73 (11.27) | ||
Note: Full scale IQ scores (FSIQ) were corrected for any age and sex effects
Mean real estate price is expressed in Euro’s. Scores were standardized (z-scores) for all subsequent analyses