Abstract
The sampling of rivers and large streams for schistosome cercariae requires a method that is both highly accurate and capable of analysing several hundred litres of water regardless of turbidity. Four techniques—direct filtration by Rowan's vacuum paper filtration method, a modification of Rowan's method, continous centrifugation, and an overlay filtration method—were compared for recovery accuracy, volume of water sampled, and ease of reading under simulated field conditions. The modified Rowan technique ranked first for mean recovery accuracy (79.4%), followed by continuous centrifugation (53.8%), Rowan's technique (25.9%), and the overlay method (22.4%). With the direct filtration techniques, the filtering rate was directly related to certain turbidity factors, the maximum being 10 litres/min with the modified Rowan technique and clear water. The continuous centrifugation and overlay methods were independent of turbidity variations. Filters could be read most quickly (mean time 3.4 min/filter) with the continuous centrifugation technique because the concentrated sample made it possible to use small (47-mm) filters. Mean reading times with the other techniques (89-mm and 90-mm filters) ranged from 5.6 to 8.4 min per filter but were highly variable in relation to turbidity, particle size, and number of cercariae recovered. Direct filtration by the modified Rowan technique is considered to be the simplest and most efficient method. When flocculation is included, the resulting additional loss of cercariae (16%) is within acceptable limits.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barrett P. D., Ellison I. R. A continuous flow centrifuge for testing the presence of Bilharzia cercariae in water. Cent Afr J Med. 1965 Nov;11(11):338–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler J. M., Jr, Ferguson F. F., Palmer J. R. New field device for quantitative recovery of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Public Health Rep. 1967 Mar;82(3):250–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olivier L. J. Infectivity of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966 Nov;15(6):882–885. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1966.15.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RADKE M. G., RITCHIE L. S., ROWAN W. B. Effects of water velocities on worm burdens of animals exposed to Schistosoma mansoni cercariae released under laboratory and field conditions. Exp Parasitol. 1961 Nov;11:323–331. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(61)90039-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROWAN W. B., GRAM A. L. Relation of water velocity to Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1959 Nov;8:630–634. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1959.8.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowan W. B. The ecology of schistosome transmission foci. Bull World Health Organ. 1965;33(1):63–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandt D. G. Direct filtration for recovery of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae in the field. Bull World Health Organ. 1973;48(1):27–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandt D. G. Evaluation of an overlay technique for the recovery of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Bull World Health Organ. 1972;47(1):125–127. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webbe G. The effect of water velocities on the infection of animals exposed to Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1966 Mar;60(1):78–84. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1966.11686388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
