Skip to main content
. 2008 May 16;95(4):1956–1964. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.129759

TABLE 2.

Comparison of models from TASSER_2.0, TASSER and PROSPECTOR_3.5

〈RMSD to the native〉, Å[SD*]
Num ID (%) Inline graphic§ Inline graphic Inline graphic MT_all** Inline graphic
Easy 1802 19 5.60 [4.33] 3.42 [2.55] 3.27 [2.35] 4.02 [2.80] 3.86 [2.61]
Medium 167 16 8.69 [5.16] 5.39 [3.54] 4.71 [2.77] 5.82 [3.61] 5.09 [2.87]
Hard 622 13 11.87 [5.66] 8.37 [4.57] 7.69 [4.17] 8.92 [4.48] 8.24 [4.12]
All 2591 17 7.30 [5.44] 4.73 [3.84] 4.42 [3.46] 5.31 [3.92] 4.99 [3.57]
*

Standard deviation.

Number of target proteins in each category.

Average sequence identity of target-template sequences.

Average RMSD to the native structure of the initial PROSPECTOR_3.5 templates§, TASSER, and TASSER_2.0 models over the same aligned regions provided from PROSPECTOR_3.5.

Average RMSD to the native structure of TASSER** and TASSER_2.0†† models over the entire molecule.