Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 15;10(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.944

Table 3.

Evaluation methods and data sources for the trans-NIH ACSI project

Method/Data Source Primary Content Planned Coverage
(actual n)
Review of secondary data
Website review
  • Coding of a variety of website characteristics

All sites (61)
ForeSee pre-implementation worksheets
  • Coding of team’s responses to pre-implementation questions

All sites (48)
ACSI data for sites generating sufficient response for model data
  • Satisfaction results per quarter

All sites collecting data during evaluation period: Q4 2004 (8) through Q1 2006 (42)
ACSI site-level data aggregated to NIH level
  • Standard custom question results

  • Secondary analysis results

All sites using standard custom question; all sites using similar questions
(varied by type of analysis)
Surveys
Initial survey
  • Site background

  • Site evaluation before ACSI

  • Reasons for joining the trans-NIH ACSI evaluation

All sites (57)
Final survey
  • Intermediate outcomes

  • Longer term outcomes

  • Trans-NIH benefits

All sites (51)
Interviews
Initial in-depth interview
(primary focus: processes)
  • Implementation process

  • Receipt and use of ACSI results

  • Trans-NIH benefits

Subset of sites (14 in 2005;
6 in 2006)
Final in-depth interview
(primary focus: outcomes)
  • Intermediate outcomes

  • Longer term outcomes

Subset of sites (20)
Final brief interview
  • Benefits of ACSI use without full activities and data for full model

Subset of sites with less ACSI experience (5)
Observations Coverage(number of meetings)
Observation of implementation and feedback meetings How teams:
  • Implemented ACSI

  • Received and reacted to feedback

Sample of meeting types – implementation, initial feedback, follow-up feedback (15)
Observation of trans-NIH meetings
  • Attendee questions and issues

  • Discussion topics

  • Case studies

All trans-NIH meetings (5)
Observation of leadership team meetings
  • Management of trans-NIH effort

  • Perceptions about ACSI use across sites

Biweekly meetings (all meetings during evaluation period)