Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2008 Apr 8;1213:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.054

Figure 5. Relationship between conditioned place preference and either cocaine or novelty response in cocaine-treated animals.

Figure 5

No significant correlations were observed between the CPP score and the initial cocaine response (a) or novelty response (c). The average CPP score for the cocaine responders (b) or the novelty responders (d) did not show any difference between their responder groups. However, there was a significant inverse relationship detected between the CPP score and the centre response (e), with the average CPP score for the low centre responders significantly higher than the high centre responders (f). Statistical significance is indicated by an asterisk with p<0.05.