Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2008 Mar 7;35(2):188–197. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9016-0

Table 2.

Summary of hierarchical regressions testing coping (engagement vs. disengagement) as a moderator between stress (traumatic vs. symptom) and mental health quality of life (QoL) for patients coping with breast cancer recurrence (N=65)

Predictor Adjusted R2 ΔR2 β t
Model 1: traumatic stress and engagement coping
    Marital status 0.119 0.135** 0.287 2.362*
    Initial QoL 0.269 0.161** 0.346 2.510*
    Traumatic Stress (IES) 0.256 0.002 −0.073 −0.539
    Engagement Coping (EC) 0.263 0.020 0.158 1.246
    IES × EC 0.252 0.003 0.057 0.471
Model 2: traumatic stress and disengagement coping
    Marital Status 0.119 0.135** 0.292 2.599*
    Initial QoL 0.269 0.161** 0.324 2.619*
    Traumatic Stress (IES) 0.256 0.002 0.039 0.298
    Disengagement Coping (DC) 0.351 0.101** −0.367 −2.963**
    IES × DC 0.344 0.005 0.078 0.662
Model 3: symptom stress and engagement coping
    Marital Status 0.119 0.135** 0.222 1.928
    Initial QoL 0.269 0.161** 0.281 2.301*
    Symptom Stress (SS) 0.317 0.059* −0.253 −1.978
    Engagement Coping (EC) 0.313 0.009 0.100 0.876
    SS × EC 0.369 0.063* 0.252 2.326*
Model 4: symptom stress and disengagement coping
    Marital Status 0.119 0.135** 0.201 1.697
    Initial QoL 0.269 0.161** 0.223 1.819
    Symptom Stress (SS) 0.317 0.059* −0.207 −1.609
    Disengagement Coping (DC) 0.382 0.072* −0.274 −2.368*
    SS × DC 0.381 0.011 −0.113 −0.958

Beta weights and t statistics are from the final step.

*

p<0.05.

**

p<0.01.