Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Oct 24;42(10):827–836. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.08.008

Table 3.

Zero-order correlations between the computer and clinical-based measures of negative symptoms for patients (n = 60).

COMPUTER MEASURES CLINICAL RATINGS
COMPUTER MEASURES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
1. Inflection (Hz.) 1.00 - - - - - - - -
2. Speech rate (words/sec.) .02 1.00 - - - - - - -
3. Positive emotion words (% of total) −.14 −.14 1.00 - - - - - -
4. Negative emotion words (% of total) .10 .48** −.35** 1.00 - - - - -
CLINICAL RATINGS
5. Lack of Vocal Inflections1 −.26* −.41** −.04 −.05 1.00 - - - -
6. Poverty of speech1 −.06 −.57** −.09 −.05 .63** 1.00 - - -
7. Increased latency1 .08 −.40** .06 −.03 .37** .62** 1.00 - -
8. SANS global alogia1 .08 −.36** .07 .08 .53** .70** .70** 1.00 -
9. SANS global anhedonia1 .30* −.09 −.02 −.03 .17 .37** .23+ .28* 1.00
10. SANS global affective flattening −.15 −.49** .12 −.28* .69** .57** .56** .50** 1.00
+

= p value < .10,

*

= p. value < .05,

**

= p. value < .01.

1

Spearman’s Rho was computed to minimize the impact of skew in the clinical rating scores.

Higher scores reflect more severe symptomatology.