Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 3;33(5):604–610. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9341-y

Table 3.

Performance of CT for the prediction of tumor invasion of the MRF at different anatomical locations.

Locations MRF invasion Observer 1 Observer 2
+ AUC (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
Low anterior 3 8 0.50 (0.10, 0.90)* 0.31 (0.00, 0.64)*
Low lat-post 32 3 0.78 (0.60, 0.97) 0.58 (0.19, 0.96)
Mid anterior 10 7 0.71 (0.46, 0.97) 0.66 (0.35, 0.97)
Mid-high lat-post 77 8 0.88 (0.73, 1.00)* 0.84 (0.66, 1.00)*
All locations** 122 26 0.82 (0.73, 0.92) 0.70 (0.56, 0.84)

Note: AUC = area under the ROC curve with 95% confidence interval; − = number of cases with a tumor free MRF predicted on MRI; + = number of cases with a tumor threatened or invaded MRF

* Statistically significant difference P ≤ 0.04

** Locations with normal rectal wall on MRI were excluded from analysis (120/268)