Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Environ (1994). 2008 Oct;42(33):7590–7599. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.041

TABLE 1.

Descriptive Statistics for Seattle and Tahoma High Capacity School Buses in the 2005−2006 School Year (>50 Seats)

Seattle
Tahoma
All Buses Subject Busesa Monitored Busesb All Buses Subject Busesa Monitored Busesb
Number of Buses 331 68 24 62 23 19
DOC Usagec 40.8% 42.6% 25.0% 3.2% 0% 0%
OEM DOC 24.8% 26.5% 25.0% 3.2% 0% 0%
DPF Usage 4.5% 5.9% 4.2% 0% 0% 0%
ULSD Usage 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Bus Mileage (in thousands) 61 (57) 60 (57) 48 (43) 110 (88) 113 (87) 117 (89)
Body Year 2001 (5) 2001 (4) 2003 (4) 1995 (7) 1996 (6) 1996 (6)
Seating Capacity 70 (4) 69 (3) 70 (3) 76 (5) 77 (5) 76 (5)
Engine Manufacturerd
    International Truck 54% 53% 46% 48% 52% 53%
    Cummins Inc. 1% 0% 0% 13% 4% 5%
    Caterpillar 34% 34% 50% 39% 43% 42%
Front Engine 98% 100% 100% 42% 30% 37%
Opacity (%) 7.1 (8.9) 8.4 (10.8) 4.6 (4.8) 21.8 (19.1) 17.5 (16.6) 16.9 (16.5)
Frequent Service (<60 days) 91% 85% 84% 0% 0% 0%
Scheduled Maintenance Frequency (days) 46 (4) 47 (5) 47 (5) 132 (101) 101 (32) 101 (34)

Continuous data are presented as the overall mean (SD).

a

Summarized values for subject buses represent the students' typical buses although substitute buses are occasionally used during periods of servicing or vehicle inspection.

b

Descriptive statistics presented for buses with valid data only.

c

25% and 27% of all Seattle buses and Seattle subject buses, respectively, were retrofit with aftermarket DOCs. All other DOCs were original equipment installed by the manufacturer.

d

Remaining buses have unknown engine types.