Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan;40(1):11–24. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.020065

Table 14 Perimenopausal women studies: no effect of oral contraceptives on bone mineral density.

Study design Reference No of patients OC exposure Measurement of BMD/bone metabolism Results
Cross sectional Fortney et al88 352 perimenopausal women (ages 40–54) Ever OC users (n = 260) v never users (n = 92) Lumbar spine, radius DPA NS increase in spinal BMD in OC users of longer duration and more recent use
Beksinska et al89 496 perimenopausal women (ages 40–49) OC users (30–40 μg EE) (n = 106) v DMPA (n = 127) v NET‐EN (n = 102) (all for ⩾1year) v control (n = 101) Distal radius, midshaft ulna DXA No significant difference in BMD between any of the groups
Case series (level 4) Volpe et al90 37 perimenopausal women (ages 45–48) 20 μg EE+150 μg desogestrel for 24 months Lumbar spine DPA NS increase in BMD (increase 8%)

OC, Oral contraceptive; BMD, bone mineral density; DPA, dual photon absorptiometry; NS, non‐significant; EE, ethinyl oestradiol; DMPA, deoxymedroxyprogesterone acetate; NET‐EN, norethisterone enanthate; DXA, dual energy x ray absorptiometry.