Table 14 Perimenopausal women studies: no effect of oral contraceptives on bone mineral density.
Study design | Reference | No of patients | OC exposure | Measurement of BMD/bone metabolism | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cross sectional | Fortney et al88 | 352 perimenopausal women (ages 40–54) | Ever OC users (n = 260) v never users (n = 92) | Lumbar spine, radius DPA | NS increase in spinal BMD in OC users of longer duration and more recent use |
Beksinska et al89 | 496 perimenopausal women (ages 40–49) | OC users (30–40 μg EE) (n = 106) v DMPA (n = 127) v NET‐EN (n = 102) (all for ⩾1year) v control (n = 101) | Distal radius, midshaft ulna DXA | No significant difference in BMD between any of the groups | |
Case series (level 4) | Volpe et al90 | 37 perimenopausal women (ages 45–48) | 20 μg EE+150 μg desogestrel for 24 months | Lumbar spine DPA | NS increase in BMD (increase 8%) |
OC, Oral contraceptive; BMD, bone mineral density; DPA, dual photon absorptiometry; NS, non‐significant; EE, ethinyl oestradiol; DMPA, deoxymedroxyprogesterone acetate; NET‐EN, norethisterone enanthate; DXA, dual energy x ray absorptiometry.