Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 4;14:1395–1400.

Table 7. Tests for model fit of the effects in rs11200638 and rs1061170.

Model for rs11200638x rs1061170
PAR % (95% CI) M-H test: p-value LRT:p-value
AICvalue
rs11200638
rs1061170
rs11200638
rs1061170
Full
58.0
(46.4, 67.0)
62.8
(45.5, 74.4)
4.24e-11
2.07e-6
1.20e-2
398.3
Rec x Rec
21.6
(13.9, 28.7)
20.1
(10.2, 28.9)
1.08e-4
2.20e-3
2.12e-2
439.5
Rec x Mul
21.7
(14.4, 28.7)
75.7
(63.3, 83.8)
1.05e-4
2.11e-6
1.62e-1
425.6
Rec x Dom
22.3
(14.4, 29.4)
60.4
(43.1, 73.6)
3.73e-5
3.38e-6
4.28e-1
428.6
Mul x Rec
67.2
(59.1, 74.0)
19.8
(8.8, 28.5)
6.11e-11
3.06e-3
2.15e-2
411.7
Mul x Mul
67.4
(60.1, 73.9)
76.1 (64.9,84.1)
4.24e-11
2.07e-6
1.45e-1
397.5
Mul x Dom
67.7
(59.8, 74.2)
62.0
(45.0, 74.9)
1.03e-11
2.83e-6
7.45e-1
399.3
Dom x Rec
56.9
(45.2, 66.2)
20.7
(10.3, 29.2)
3.63e-11
1.71e-3
4.77e-2
412.5
Dom x Mul
57.5
(47.1, 66.0)
76.7
(66.1, 84.3)
2.51e-11
1.06e-6
2.47e-1
397.8
Dom x Doc 58.2
(47.4, 67.3) 62.9
(45.7, 74.9) 6.88e-12 1.80e-6 9.51e-1 400.6

Models for rs11200638 × rs1061170. Note: According to AIC value, Mul x Mul model fits the data best. Similar results for rs10490924 × rs1061170.