Skip to main content
. 2008 May 16;74(14):4381–4389. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00484-08

TABLE 1.

Evaluation of the sensitivities of susceptible and Cry2A-resistant H. armigera larvae to M. anisopliaea

Spore concn (no. of spores/ml) H. armigera strain No. of larvae exposed No. of dead larvae (no. of larvae producing spores) Mortality (%) Mean wt (mg) Distribution of larval instars (%)
L3 L4 L5
0 Susceptible 60 6 (0) 10.0 68.0 0 48.2 51.9
Cry2A resistant 60 6 (0) 10.0 77.7 0 37.0 63.0
9.6 × 105 Susceptible 59 11 (0) 18.6 68.1 0 51.1 48.9
Cry2A resistant 59 5 (0) 8.5 67.2 0 59.3 40.7
4.8 × 106 Susceptible 61 24 (6) 39.3 66.7 0 75.7 24.3
Cry2A resistant 61 6 (1) 9.8 75.9 0 65.5 34.6
2.4 × 107 Susceptible 55 19 (6) 34.5 63.3 0 81.1 18.9
Cry2A resistant 57 8 (2) 17.0 83.1 0 69.4 30.6
1.2 × 108 Susceptible 59 25 (15) 42.4 59.3 0 88.2 11.8
Cry2A resistant 58 16 (8) 27.6 76.9 0 63.4 36.6
6 × 108 Susceptible 60 37 (27) 61.7 63.2 12.0 48.0 40.0
Cry2A resistant 57 26 (24) 45.6 72.4 0 56.7 43.3
3 × 109 Susceptible 59 51 (48) 86.4 51.2 0 100 0
Cry2A resistant 59 47 (46) 79.7 57.9 9.1 72.7 18.2
a

Larvae were exposed to chickpea leaves treated with six different spore concentrations for 2 days, differing fivefold in their spore concentrations. Subsequently, the larvae were provided with untreated chickpea leaves every other day until day 8. Weight is shown as the mean weight of all survivors per treatment. The larval instar reached by surviving larvae at the completion of the experiment is given as the percentage of survivors. n = 55 to 61.