Skip to main content
. 2008 May 23;74(14):4477–4490. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00440-08

TABLE 2.

Analysis of proteins (from 2D gels) whose expression levels were significantly different under two different conditionsa

Protein no. Locus tag(s) pI (theoretical) Mass (kDa) (theoretical) Identification
1 A3089 4.9 69.9 DnaK (HSP70; chaperone)
2 A0706 5.0 57.3 GroEL (HSP60; chaperone)
3 + 4 + 5 B2360 4.98 44.8 Flagellin (FliC)
6 A2752/A2054 5.21/5.26 32.5/30.9 UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GalU)/protein translation elongation factor TS
7 B1369 6.38 43.0 β-Ketothiolase
8 + 9 A1381 5.96 20.0 PhaP1; isoforms
10 A1574 7.29 27.5 Ankyrin repeat protein
11 Not identified
12 PHG089 6.82 26.2 NAD-reducing hydrogenase diaphorase moiety small subunit (HoxU)
13 A1618 6.05 16.6 Conserved hypothetical protein
14 A0750 5.7 12.3 Nitrogen-regulatory protein PII
15 A0750/A0320 5.87/5.7 12.2/12.3 Nitrogen-regulatory protein PII/nitrogen-regulatory protein PII (GlnK)
16 A0705 5.8 10.5 Cochaperonin GroES (HSP10)
17 A0320 5.87 12.2 Nitrogen-regulatory protein PII (GlnK)
18 B0194 7.93 12.6 Conserved hypothetical protein
19 A0386 7.30 13.6 Sigma 54 modulation protein S30EA
a

Identification of isolated proteins was done by tryptic digestion, MALDI-TOF, and, finally, comparison of the resulting mass spectrum data with hypothetical spectra out of the R. eutropha H16 data bank by in silico digestion.