Skip to main content
. 2008 May 30;74(14):4417–4426. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00042-08

TABLE 2.

Parameters for the kinetic model of the hydroxylamine disproportionation in the experiment shown in Fig. 5

Parameter Description Unit Valuea
Model A Model B
k1 Rate constant of hydrazine formationb mmol/g DW/h 0.25 0.29
k2 Rate constant of ammonificationb mmol/g DW/h 0.30 0.31
k3A Rate constant for hydrazine disproportionationb mmol/g DW/h 0.024 n.a.d
k3B Rate constant for reversed hydrazine formationb mmol/g DW/h 0.080
K1,NH2OH Half-saturation constant for hydroxylamine conversion with ammonium into hydrazineb mM 0.0011 0.010
K2,N2H4 Half-saturation constant for hydrazine oxidation to N2b mM 0.00063 0.00050
K2,NH2OH Half-saturation constant for hydroxylamine reduction to ammoniumb mM 0.14 0.20
K3A,N2H4 Half-saturation constant for hydrazineb mM 0.044 n.a.
K3B,N2H4 Half-saturation constant for hydrazineb mM n.a. 0.0061
Cx Biomass concnc g DW/liter 7.8 7.8
C0,N2H4 Initial hydrazine concnc mM 0.0001 0.0001
C0,NH4 Initial ammonium concnc mM 2.0 2.0
C0,NH2OH Initial hydroxylamine concnc mM 4.1 4.1
a

Model A involved a separate hydrazine disproportionation reaction, whereas with model B, the hydrazine formation reaction was considered to be reversible. The two reaction schemes are presented in Fig. 4.

b

Parameters were fitted to the measured nitrogen species concentrations.

c

Initial conditions were based on measured values.

d

n.a., not applicable.