Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2008 Aug;59(2):183–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.04.001

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Associative recognition results of Experiment 2. Panel A. Proportion of ‘Old-Old (original)’ hit responses to intact word pairs and ‘Old-Old (original)’ false alarm responses to rearranged word pairs as a function of associative interference (Rep×5, Fan 1-1, [Fan 1-5, Fan 5-1], Fan 5-5). Panel B. Mean d′ statistic as a function of associative interference (fan). The error bars are standard errors of the mean.

Panel A. Proportion of ‘Old-Old (original)’ hit responses to intact word pairs and ‘Old-Old (original)’ false alarm responses to rearranged word pairs as a function of increasing associative interference (Rep ×5, Fan 1-1, [Fan 1-5, Fan 5-1], Fan 5-5). Panel B. Mean d′ statistic as a function of associative interference. The error bars are standard errors of the mean.