Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 19;33(8):821–832. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn010

Table III.

Standardized Estimates of the Structural Equation Models

Independent Variables
Basic Model Cognitions—readiness
Model 1 Fathers’ smoking
Model 2 Mothers’ Smoking
Model 3 Best friends’ Smoking
Model 4 Nicotine dependence
Model 5 Craving
Asthma No asthma Asthma No asthma Asthma No asthma Asthma No asthma Asthma No asthma Asthma No asthma
Independent variable—Pros of quitting −.18 −.06 −.21* −.09** .28* −.02 .03 −.04 −.03 −.09**
Independent variable—Pros of smoking .11 −.01 .10 .01 .30** .03 .37*** .40*** .37*** .44***
Independent variable—Self- efficacy −.12 −.03 −.11 −.10** .01 .02 −.48*** −.47*** −.45*** −.43***
Pros of Quitting—Readiness to quit .25* .30** .21* .30*** .21* .29*** .27* −.30*** .25* .30*** .23* .29***
Pros of Smoking—Readiness to quit −.21* −.11** −.18 −.11** −.21* −.11** −.19 −.10** −.21* −.07* −.17 −.06
Self-efficacy—Readiness to quit .16 .06 .15 .05 .14 .05 .16 .06 .01 .00 −.02 .02
Independent variable—Readiness to quit −.23* −.09** −.15 −.09** −.09 −.03 −.20 −.16*** −.34** −.14***
R2 .17 .11 .22 .12 .18 .12 .16 .11 .18 .13 .23 .13

Coefficients for the smokers with asthma are depicted before the slash; the coefficients for the smokers without asthma are depicted after the slash.

The ‘Independent Variables’ in the left columns are the ones denoted in the upper right columns. p <.10, *p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001.

Some paths were not significant among adolescents with asthma whereas they were significant among adolescents without asthma, and vice versa. Although this may seem as a difference, please note that significance of estimates is dependent on sample size.