Table III.
Standardized Estimates of the Structural Equation Models
|
Independent Variables |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Basic Model Cognitions—readiness |
Model 1 Fathers’ smoking |
Model 2 Mothers’ Smoking |
Model 3 Best friends’ Smoking |
Model 4 Nicotine dependence |
Model 5 Craving |
|||||||
| Asthma | No asthma | Asthma | No asthma | Asthma | No asthma | Asthma | No asthma | Asthma | No asthma | Asthma | No asthma | |
| Independent variable—Pros of quitting | −.18† | −.06† | −.21* | −.09** | .28* | −.02 | .03 | −.04 | −.03 | −.09** | ||
| Independent variable—Pros of smoking | .11 | −.01 | .10 | .01 | .30** | .03 | .37*** | .40*** | .37*** | .44*** | ||
| Independent variable—Self- efficacy | −.12 | −.03 | −.11 | −.10** | .01 | .02 | −.48*** | −.47*** | −.45*** | −.43*** | ||
| Pros of Quitting—Readiness to quit | .25* | .30** | .21* | .30*** | .21* | .29*** | .27* | −.30*** | .25* | .30*** | .23* | .29*** |
| Pros of Smoking—Readiness to quit | −.21* | −.11** | −.18† | −.11** | −.21* | −.11** | −.19† | −.10** | −.21* | −.07* | −.17 | −.06† |
| Self-efficacy—Readiness to quit | .16 | .06 | .15 | .05 | .14 | .05 | .16 | .06† | .01 | .00 | −.02 | .02 |
| Independent variable—Readiness to quit | −.23* | −.09** | −.15 | −.09** | −.09 | −.03 | −.20† | −.16*** | −.34** | −.14*** | ||
| R2 | .17 | .11 | .22 | .12 | .18 | .12 | .16 | .11 | .18 | .13 | .23 | .13 |
Coefficients for the smokers with asthma are depicted before the slash; the coefficients for the smokers without asthma are depicted after the slash.
The ‘Independent Variables’ in the left columns are the ones denoted in the upper right columns. †p <.10, *p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001.
Some paths were not significant among adolescents with asthma whereas they were significant among adolescents without asthma, and vice versa. Although this may seem as a difference, please note that significance of estimates is dependent on sample size.