Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 8;283(32):22007–22017. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801839200

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

A, dependence of reaction rate on tRNA concentration for aminoacylation by M. mazei SepRS. Replot of Inline graphic concentration versus initial velocities determined from time courses. The inset shows the imaged TLC plate of a single time course for Inline graphic. B, the secondary structures of M. mazei tRNACys isoacceptors Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic, are depicted from left to right. The 7-66 base pair at the bottom of the acceptor stem, which distinguishes Inline graphic from Inline graphic, is shown in boldface type on the Inline graphic cloverleaf at the center. Nucleotides distinguishing Inline graphic (left) from both Inline graphic and Inline graphic are shown in boldface type on the Inline graphic cloverleaf. Mutations of Inline graphic (right) made in this study are circled. The correspondence between the nucleotides and the mutations described under “Results and Discussion” and in Table 1 is as follows: tRNACysΔ2, introduction of A33 from Inline graphic into Inline graphic; tRNACysΔ3, introduction of A57 from Inline graphic into Inline graphic; tRNACysΔ5, introduction of both C49 and U51 from Inline graphic into Inline graphic; tRNACysΔ4, introduction of the five D-loop and variable loop nucleotides U20, C21, U44, A46, and G47 from Inline graphic into Inline graphic.