Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Biochem. 2008 Apr 10;378(2):202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.04.012

Table 2. Millimolar absorption coefficients (ε) at 280 nm for full length hTF and oTF.

All samples were assayed in 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 (iron-bound) or 100 mM Acetate, pH 4.0 and 4 mM EDTA (Apo).

Protein Calculated ε280 (Apo)a Experimental ε280 (Apo)b Experimental ε280 (Iron)b % Increase due to ironc % Difference Calc/Expc
Diferric hTF 85.1 84.0 ± 0.2 103.9 ± 0.2 23.7 −1.3
Monoferric-N hTFd 82.1 81.4 ± 0.3 92.5 ± 0.3 13.6 −0.9
Monoferric-C hTFe 82.1 81.5 ± 0.2 92.1 ± 0.2 13.0 −0.7
Apo hTFf 79.2 80.1 ± 0.4 - - 1.1
Diferric oTF 88.2 87.9 ± 0.1 109.3 ± 0.2 24.3 −0.3
a

Calculated from Eq. 2.

b

Values are means ± STD of at least three determinations.

c

Percent increase and difference are calculated as in Table 1.

d

Recombinant non-glycosylated His tagged hTF with Y426F and Y517F mutations inhibiting its ability to coordinate iron in the C-lobe.

e

Recombinant non-glycosylated His tagged hTF with Y95F and Y188F mutations inhibiting its ability to coordinate iron in the N-lobe.

f

This is non-glycosylated authentic recombinant His tagged apo-hTF mutant (Y95F/Y188F/Y426F/Y517F).