Table 1.
Study extent | Socioeconomic objective | Area required to meet targets | Cost of meeting targets |
---|---|---|---|
All | None | 18.4 Mha | 2.2 Mha cropped land (12% of total priority area is subject to cropping) |
Minimize area cropped in priority set | 18.8 Mha (increase of 2%) | 1.1 Mha cropped land (6% of total priority area is subject to cropping) | |
Potential conservation habitat | None | 17.84 Mha | 1.5 times minimum opportunity cost |
Minimize opportunity cost of the priority set | 18.21 Mha (increase of 2%) | Minimum opportunity cost |
Areas of intensive use are excluded when employing the opportunity cost layer as it represents the cost of forgone production in areas of land that are not under intensive use (hereafter “potential conservation habitat”). Hence scenarios with differing study area extents are not comparable.