Table 4.

Condom use to avoid AIDS by selected socio-economic variables

Characteristics		Unadjusted comparison		Multiple logistic regression
		N (% yes¶)	P	OR	95% CI	P
Slum	Non-slum	480 (35.6)		1.00
	Slum	120 (25.8)	0.042	1.06	0.64–1.78	0.815
Place of residence	Town/city	169 (52.7)		1.00
	Country side	431 (26.2)	<0.001	0.43	0.28–0.64	<0.001
Composite variable of household characteristics	Poor	169 (16.6)		1.00
	Not-poor	428 (40.2)	<0.001	1.60	0.95–2.69	0.078
Composite variable of mass media access	Not at all	114 (6.1)		1.00
	At least one media	485 (40.2)	<0.001	5.81	2.58–13.10	<0.001
Education	No education	199 (14.1)		1.00
	1–5 years education	173 (30.6)	<0.001	2.25	1.30–3.88	0.004
	6+ years education	228 (53.1)	<0.001	4.55	2.70–7.69	<0.001

^¶Percentage of reporting condom use as a method of AIDS prevention